Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sock_raw [2014/05/03 17:29] – OlivierCochardLabbésock_raw [2014/09/04 08:08] (current) – OlivierCochardLabbé
Line 10: Line 10:
 - packets' ip_len and ip_off are converted to host byte order - packets' ip_len and ip_off are converted to host byte order
  
-We are targeting at 11.0-RELEASE to pass unmodified packets on SOCK_RAW sockets.+For longer story see: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2014-January/047937.html
  
-Expected ''%%__FreeBSD_version%%'' is 1100012. +We are targeting at 11.0-RELEASE to pass unmodified packets on SOCK_RAW sockets. This was committed as r270929i, new ''%%__FreeBSD_version%%'' is 1100030.
- +
-Preliminary patch is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/raw_is_raw.diff+
  
 The minimal set of software in ports that we must adopt by the time patch hits the tree: The minimal set of software in ports that we must adopt by the time patch hits the tree:
  
 | port name | status | | port name | status |
-| src/contrib/traceroute | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/freebsd.raw_socket-traceroute.patch|usr.sbin/traceroute/Makefile patch]] for setting BYTESWAP_IP_HDR | +| src/contrib/traceroute | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/freebsd.raw_socket-traceroute.patch|usr.sbin/traceroute/Makefile patch]] for setting BYTESWAP_IP_HDR (included in the same commit as sock_raw) | 
-| net/quagga & net/quagga-re | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.quagga.patch|quagga patch]] and [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.quagga-re.patch|quagga-re patch]] (ospf tested on quagga-re) | +| net/quagga & net/quagga-re | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.quagga.patch|quagga patch]] and [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.quagga-re.patch|quagga-re patch]] (ospf tested on quagga-re) [[https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193244|PR 193244]] | 
-| net/zebra | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.zebra.patch|zebra patch]]  (ospf tested) | +| net/zebra | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.zebra.patch|zebra patch]]  (ospf tested) [[https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193249|PR 193249]] | 
-| libnet/libdnet |  | +| libnet/libdnet | File trunk/config/acinclude.m4 set HAVE_RAWIP_HOST_OFFLEN if OS use host byte ordering: Need to be patched. But I've tested net/dhcprelay (uses libdnet) without patch and it's not impacted | 
-| security/ipsec-tools |  | +| security/ipsec-tools | A port bug (regression since 0.8.1) prevent me to test it (bug related to NAT-T, but even with "nat_traversal off;" in my config file I can't use it) | 
-| openvpn |  | +| openvpn | not impacted (tested) | 
-| racoon2 |  | +| freevrrpd | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.freevrrpd.patch|freevrrpd patch]] [[https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193243|PR 193243]] | 
-| relayd |  |+| relayd | not impacted (tested) |
 | net/isc-dhcp*-server%%|%%relay | isc-dhcp43-relay-4.3.0 and isc-dhcp43-server-4.3.0 not impacted (tested) | | net/isc-dhcp*-server%%|%%relay | isc-dhcp43-relay-4.3.0 and isc-dhcp43-server-4.3.0 not impacted (tested) |
-| bird | ospf impacted: "Socket error on em0: Invalid argument". Because it works on 10.0 without patching it, it should be a "host byte order" problem and not an "ip_len": sysdep/bsd/sysio.h ? | +| bird | ospfv2 (bird) impacted: "Socket error on em0: Invalid argument". Because it works on 10.0 without patching it, it should be a "host byte order" problem and not an "ip_len": sysdep/bsd/sysio.h ? [[https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193245|PR 193245]] | 
-| net-snmp |  |+| net-snmp | not impacted (tested) |
 | dnsmasq |  | | dnsmasq |  |
 | fping | not impacted (tested) | | fping | not impacted (tested) |
  
  • sock_raw.1399138141.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2014/05/03 17:29
  • by OlivierCochardLabbé