Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sock_raw [2014/09/01 14:06] – glebiussock_raw [2014/09/04 08:08] (current) – OlivierCochardLabbé
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 | port name | status | | port name | status |
-| src/contrib/traceroute | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/freebsd.raw_socket-traceroute.patch|usr.sbin/traceroute/Makefile patch]] for setting BYTESWAP_IP_HDR | +| src/contrib/traceroute | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/freebsd.raw_socket-traceroute.patch|usr.sbin/traceroute/Makefile patch]] for setting BYTESWAP_IP_HDR (included in the same commit as sock_raw) | 
-| net/quagga & net/quagga-re | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.quagga.patch|quagga patch]] and [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.quagga-re.patch|quagga-re patch]] (ospf tested on quagga-re) | +| net/quagga & net/quagga-re | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.quagga.patch|quagga patch]] and [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.quagga-re.patch|quagga-re patch]] (ospf tested on quagga-re) [[https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193244|PR 193244]] | 
-| net/zebra | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.zebra.patch|zebra patch]]  (ospf tested) |+| net/zebra | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.zebra.patch|zebra patch]]  (ospf tested) [[https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193249|PR 193249]] |
 | libnet/libdnet | File trunk/config/acinclude.m4 set HAVE_RAWIP_HOST_OFFLEN if OS use host byte ordering: Need to be patched. But I've tested net/dhcprelay (uses libdnet) without patch and it's not impacted | | libnet/libdnet | File trunk/config/acinclude.m4 set HAVE_RAWIP_HOST_OFFLEN if OS use host byte ordering: Need to be patched. But I've tested net/dhcprelay (uses libdnet) without patch and it's not impacted |
 | security/ipsec-tools | A port bug (regression since 0.8.1) prevent me to test it (bug related to NAT-T, but even with "nat_traversal off;" in my config file I can't use it) | | security/ipsec-tools | A port bug (regression since 0.8.1) prevent me to test it (bug related to NAT-T, but even with "nat_traversal off;" in my config file I can't use it) |
 | openvpn | not impacted (tested) | | openvpn | not impacted (tested) |
-| freevrrpd | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.freevrrpd.patch|freevrrpd patch]] |+| freevrrpd | [[http://dev.bsdrp.net/SOCK_RAW/ports.freevrrpd.patch|freevrrpd patch]] [[https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193243|PR 193243]] |
 | relayd | not impacted (tested) | | relayd | not impacted (tested) |
 | net/isc-dhcp*-server%%|%%relay | isc-dhcp43-relay-4.3.0 and isc-dhcp43-server-4.3.0 not impacted (tested) | | net/isc-dhcp*-server%%|%%relay | isc-dhcp43-relay-4.3.0 and isc-dhcp43-server-4.3.0 not impacted (tested) |
-| bird | ospfv2 (bird) impacted: "Socket error on em0: Invalid argument". Because it works on 10.0 without patching it, it should be a "host byte order" problem and not an "ip_len": sysdep/bsd/sysio.h ? |+| bird | ospfv2 (bird) impacted: "Socket error on em0: Invalid argument". Because it works on 10.0 without patching it, it should be a "host byte order" problem and not an "ip_len": sysdep/bsd/sysio.h ? [[https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193245|PR 193245]] |
 | net-snmp | not impacted (tested) | | net-snmp | not impacted (tested) |
 | dnsmasq |  | | dnsmasq |  |
 | fping | not impacted (tested) | | fping | not impacted (tested) |
  
  • sock_raw.1409580411.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2014/09/01 14:06
  • by glebius