Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- summerofcode2015:linuxpackagesforpkg [2015/09/17 07:28] – fixed mail address ManuelWiesinger
+++ summerofcode2015:linuxpackagesforpkg [2022/10/03 02:29] (current) – Clean up personal links, add spaces for sections, update pkg link KubilayKocak
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== Linux packages for pkg(8) ======
+===== Linux packages for pkg(8) =====
-  * Student: [[/ManuelWiesinger|Manuel Wiesinger]] (mdw@)
-  * Mentor: [[/BaptisteDaroussin|Baptiste Daroussin]] (bapt@)
+  * Student: [[/ManuelWiesinger|ManuelWiesinger]]
+  * Mentor: [[/BaptisteDaroussin|BaptisteDaroussin]]
 ===== Project description =====
@@ Line 8: / Line 9: @@
 The biggest challenge is to use the SAT-solver of [[https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=pkg&sektion=8|pkg(8)]] for foreign dependencies.
-The recommended way (that is used by most major Linux-distros, including Debian) to verify packages, is using [[https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals/gnupg/gpgv.html|gpgv]]. I think verifying Debian-packages with openssl can easily become very cumbersome and error prone. The simplest approach seems to be using an exec-function. Unfortunately this means to depend on GPLv3 code. In my eyes a reasonable compromise is to ask the user to install it manually, if it is not.
+The recommended way (that is used by most major Linux-distros, including Debian) to verify packages, is using [[https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals/gnupg/gpgv.html|gpgv]]. I think verifying Debian-packages with %%OpenSSL%% can easily become very cumbersome and error prone. The simplest approach seems to be using an exec-function. Unfortunately this means to depend on GPLv3 code. In my eyes a reasonable compromise is to ask the user to install it manually, if it is not.
 ===== Deliverables =====
 a forked git repository including:
@@ Line 331: / Line 334: @@
 ===== Useful links =====
-  * [[/pkgng|pkgng]]
+  * [[/pkg]]
   * [[/PkgPrimer|PkgPrimer]]