Show pageOld revisionsBacklinksBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. Attendees: rgrimes@, rscheff@, rrs@, thj@, tuexen@ ====== Discussion ====== * tuexen discussed how to mitigate blackhole detection problems * tuexen@ has a review to ensure we don't do blackhole detection once we are at the minimum value [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24308|D24308]]; committed * Discussion on what should trigger blackhole detection -- full size? Or, even smaller messages which are above our min MTU? For at least IPv6, min MTU makes sense. * Otherwise, tuexen@'s plan remains unchanged. * BBR and RACK needs some modifcation * Discussion of [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24237|D24237]]: rscheff@ changed both the in-order and out-of-order data path so we call sorwakeup_locked() [when necessary] after the SACK blocks are updated. Still ongoing. rrs@ will review. * [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24657|D24657]]: Waiting for testing by %%NetApp%%. * [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24902|D24902]]: Use nsec granularity instead ticks to allow other use cases. Will be done in two steps to keep Netflix tree in sync with respect to the black box logging. * [[https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241958|PR241958]]: rrs is working on it. * Clarification of handling the sackOK option. rscheff will review the code. * [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25016|D25016]]: Improve after idle. Don't overload variables and introduce a new variable. * [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25065|D25065]]: Cubic for large time of being app limited. Approved. * [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25066|D25066]]: Improve dd. Approved. * [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24869|D24869]]: It was concluded that this should not hit head before the discussion at the IETF is over. Next meeting: 4 June @ 1700 UTC (DIFFERENT TIME!) transportprotocols/04june2020.txt Last modified: 2020/06/06 06:33by MarkLinimon