Show pageOld revisionsBacklinksBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. Attendees: rgrimes@, rscheff@, rrs@, tuexen@ ====== Discussion ====== * tuexen discussed how to mitigate blackhole detection problems * tuexen@ has a review to ensure we don't do blackhole detection once we are at the minimum value [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24308|D24308]]; committed * Discussion on what should trigger blackhole detection -- full size? Or, even smaller messages which are above our min MTU? For at least IPv6, min MTU makes sense. * Otherwise, tuexen@'s plan remains unchanged. * BBR and RACK needs some modifcation * Discussion of [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24237|D24237]]: rscheff@ changed both the in-order and out-of-order data path so we call sorwakeup_locked() [when necessary] after the SACK blocks are updated. rrs@ will review. * [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24657|D24657]]: Waiting for testing by %%NetApp%%. * [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24817|D24817]]: Accepted. * [[https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24902|D24902]]: Use nsec granularity instead ticks to allow other use cases. Next meeting: 4 June @ 1700 UTC (DIFFERENT TIME!) transportprotocols/21may2020.txt Last modified: 2020/05/21 23:07by MarkLinimon