transportprotocols:04june2020

Attendees: rgrimes@, rscheff@, rrs@, thj@, tuexen@

Discussion

  • tuexen discussed how to mitigate blackhole detection problems
    • tuexen@ has a review to ensure we don't do blackhole detection once we are at the minimum value D24308; committed
    • Discussion on what should trigger blackhole detection – full size? Or, even smaller messages which are above our min MTU? For at least IPv6, min MTU makes sense.
    • Otherwise, tuexen@'s plan remains unchanged.
    • BBR and RACK needs some modifcation
  • Discussion of D24237: rscheff@ changed both the in-order and out-of-order data path so we call sorwakeup_locked() [when necessary] after the SACK blocks are updated. Still ongoing. rrs@ will review.
  • D24657: Waiting for testing by NetApp.
  • D24902: Use nsec granularity instead ticks to allow other use cases. Will be done in two steps to keep Netflix tree in sync with respect to the black box logging.
  • PR241958: rrs is working on it.
  • Clarification of handling the sackOK option. rscheff will review the code.
  • D25016: Improve after idle. Don't overload variables and introduce a new variable.
  • D25065: Cubic for large time of being app limited. Approved.
  • D25066: Improve dd. Approved.
  • D24869: It was concluded that this should not hit head before the discussion at the IETF is over.

Next meeting: 4 June @ 1700 UTC (DIFFERENT TIME!)

  • transportprotocols/04june2020.txt
  • Last modified: 2020/06/06 06:33
  • by MarkLinimon